New Delhi, April 7th
The clipping system did not provide equal opportunities for all students, but CUET will evaluate them on the same parameters and will not be detrimental to those who have studied on councils that do not indulgently grade, said Delhi University Vice Chancellor Yogesh Singh. on Thursday.
Registration for the General Entrance Test (CUET) for undergraduate courses at 45 central universities began on Wednesday (April 6th).
“CUET is a transparent system based on entrance tests, and each student will be given equal opportunities. The previous system (cut) did not give equal opportunities to students,” Singh said in an interview with PTI.
Noting that the previous system gave excessive preference to those who studied on boards with a soft grading system, he said that all students should be assessed on similar parameters.
“The previous system did not favor those who came from strict or moderate councils. In a country like India, there are 30 to 40 state councils, each council has its own uniqueness, and we respect that. But students need to be measured by similar parameters.” – Singh said.
However, critics say CUET will evoke a culture of coaching and will be disadvantageous for students from boards other than CBSE because the curriculum will be mapped with the NCERT program.
“Our goal as a university is to provide equal opportunities. I don’t think students will need coaching because the question will be easy for those who have studied the 12th grade curriculum well.”
“These issues should be handled with reasonable difficulty, and for those who did well in grade 12, it shouldn’t be difficult,” Singh said.
Speaking about the curriculum of the National Council for Research and Teaching in Education (NCERT), he said most students study in the same curriculum in the twelfth grade.
“Only time will tell (how the test will pass). But NCERT is the right choice because it is studied mainly,” he added.
Some academics believe that CUET needed to be postponed to next year as students have faced a lot of uncertainty in the last two years due to the coronavirus pandemic.
But Singh defended the move, saying “it’s the right time to hold a CUET”.
“Everyone was affected by the pandemic. If we do it next year, the type of issues will be different, the burden will be different. The whole country has suffered from the pandemic, and the advantages and disadvantages will be for everyone,” he said. added.
Others felt that CUET would be beneficial for students with academic experience as they would be able to choose the humanities and commercial subjects. Under the shutdown system, until 2020, students faced a deduction of five percent of points for changing flows, but then it was canceled.
“The count was based on the fact that science students earn more than humanities students. But with this system, the percentage will be calculated,” Singh said.
For example, if the highest score in science is 60, the student will be given 100 percent. The same will be true for a history student. If a history student scores 50, which is the highest score, he will be given 100 percent, Singh explained.
“In fact, this system bridges the gap,” he said.