Home Education Lessons learned during COVID on scientific collaboration (opinion)

Lessons learned during COVID on scientific collaboration (opinion)

Lessons learned during COVID on scientific collaboration (opinion)

Over the past two years, countless opinions and advice have been written on the harmful effects of the COVID pandemic on teacher performance and well-being. At the moment we all know that the pandemic has affected the color faculties differently, especially womenwho bore the brunt care responsibilities– including juggling household chores with hired labor. However, less attention was paid to joint projects initiated by teachers during and about pandemic, how these projects were carried out in such stressful times and what can be learned from them.

Our story is about how two color teachers who have never met before have built a fruitful research collaboration that arose from their almost internal need to connect and heal in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. As members of two different minority communities, Anahi, an Argentine immigrant and Vivian, the daughter of Chinese immigrants, we have witnessed disproportionately high morbidity and mortality rates affecting our ethnic groups, especially during the pandemic.

Barricaded at home, we first found ourselves feverishly watching the devastating cycles of COVID-19 news, suffering for beloved relatives and friends who had contracted the terrible virus. This journey continued last year as we struggled with how to help elderly loved ones successfully cope with the complex online vaccine planning process in the city.

However, despite what seemed like pandemic chaos, we soon realized that we could not allow COVID-19 to catapult us into academic paralysis. Accordingly, we decided to turn our experience into a research project. Here are some key lessons we’ve learned along the way on how to build effective research partnerships in difficult times, such as a pandemic – lessons that will remain relevant once we finally get out of it. Even as personal meetings began to resume on our campuses, the pandemic taught us that virtual meetings are here to stay.

Take advantage of virtual meeting platforms. We operate at the City University of New York, the country’s largest urban public university, a broad system of 25 suburban campuses that houses a vibrant and diverse group of scholars and students in a highly disjointed system. Although we were both trained as sociologists and immigration comparativists, we would probably never have met in person, much less collaborated, in pre-pandemic times.

We met almost in April 2020, just as the nation was emerging from the first wave of deaths from COVID-19. At the time, we were preparing to participate in a panel discussion at the Roosevelt House Public Policy Institute at Hunter College called Discriminatory effects of COVID-19a faculty webinar designed to make sense of what just happened.

Anai’s presentation appealed to the unauthorized Latin population in New York and their particular vulnerability to the pandemic, especially given the lack of documents and the structural conditions of racism they felt. Vivian focused on Asian Americans and COVID-19 and their constant invisibility in pandemic discussions – almost a year before two mass shootings in Atlanta and Indianapolis exacerbated Asian-American invisibility to even deeper and more painful clarity.

We quickly learned about our general research programs and after the webinar decided to gather online to discuss what we were most interested in and worried about. We then developed joint research projects that also served us as effective strategies to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.

Write about what is important in your discipline – and for you. We wanted to find out what happened during this crucial start of the pandemic, and knew we needed to find a meaningful research topic. By then, we were already painfully aware of the COVID-19 stigma faced by Latin American immigrants and Asian groups in the U.S. and abroad. Not only did we share the fear of infection (and death) that affected our communities, but we also lived with the pervasive threat of verbal and physical attacks, especially against Asians. So we took our personal experience as a launching pad to start writing about what’s happening locally and globally.

Follow the funnel approach. During our initial meetings at Zoom, we highlighted a wide network of potential topics and gradually began to reduce topics related to globalized racism and the stigma of COVID-19. This was combined with our interest in deconstructing the widespread rhetoric surrounding the COVID-19 stigma advocated by national figures, including former President Trump and Brazilian President Jair Bolsanara. We conducted an extensive literature search and read feverishly, and then discussed our findings on how media framing has affected public perceptions of Asians and undocumented Latinos as “vectors of COVID-19 infection”. We read, wrote, sent each other literature reviews and abstracts by e-mail, and then zoomed in to continue the results of our research.

Decide on one topic and specify the exact timing. Given our mutual interests and training in discourse analysis and the media, we ended up focusing our research on then-President Trump’s publications on social media along with his speeches and press releases. We asked ourselves: did Trump’s rhetoric resonate with the pandemic of hatred targeting Latinos and Asians in America? And if so, how did it happen? Once we had determined the objectives of the study and the data collection strategy, we divided the objectives and set specific submission dates for the individual sections. One week before each deadline, we emailed each other reminders and asked for help when we needed it.

Find the place of publication. In the meantime, we began looking for applications for articles on the COVID-19 study, hoping to formalize our work amid ongoing scientific discussions, seeking an accelerated review process. Special issue of 2021 Social Sciences an invitation to immigration and white supremacy in the 21st century has solidified our efforts. We sent a short proposal to the invited editors, which was accepted, and shortly thereafter our research partnership officially began. The commitment to submit our work to a special issue was extremely helpful as it forced us to stick to a schedule.

After all, the results of our study on Trump’s social media convincingly highlighted the role of white supremacy in stigmatizing minority groups. Our main conclusions stressed that Trump’s “divide, distract and rule” communication strategy served as a rhetorical platform that exacerbated the deep political divisions in the US electorate over the widespread public image of Asians and Latinos as COVID-19 carriers. Over time, our research partnership has led us to a better understanding of the strength of white supremacy in shaping public discourses on COVID-19 and, at the same time, has helped us overcome our grief even as the health crisis continues.

Over the past two years, we have experienced bouts of intellectual paralysis, and this – combined with our many work and family commitments – has sometimes distanced us from our scholarly work. However, along the way, our research partnership has become a valuable anchor that holds us accountable for what we continue to do most importantly.

During a wonderful evening last summer, we first met in person to celebrate the latest publication of our newspaper. Dining out in the open heated courtyard, we joked about the fact that, oddly enough, the pandemic, which painfully separated people, made it easier for us to continue our research work. We recently met again in person for the second time, and now that we’re finishing writing this article, we’ve started working on a new research collaboration and just outlined the next date Zoom.

Source link

Previous articleWomen are still paid 83 cents for every dollar earned by men. That’s why
Next articleWhy the first year is most important for transfer