On the first day of the 2021 legislative session, MP Ron Nate returned to the House of Representatives Brit Reibuld after barely regaining his seat in the House of Representatives in the House of Representatives acting as their de facto spokesman.
“Conservative lawmakers believe it is time to restore the important checks and balances that have been blurred, especially in 2020,” he said. presenting a list of policy priorities was called the Idaho Conservative Program.
Anti-blocking activist Sarah Walton Brady filmed the event by wearing a yellow Star of David with the inscription “CALLED” on her chest, which apparently equates wearing a mask during a pandemic to the extermination of Jews by the Nazis during World War II. Reporters in the audience were joined by members of the Idaho Freedom Foundation, a right-wing group whose works Nate will continue to echo. literally without quoting themin the legislature.
Nate closed the event interview with Freedom Foundation Vice President Dustin Hearst, then retired to the Capitol Basement Hall.
During the next two legislative sessions to follow, Nate will teach his own conservative agenda leading a successful seek cuts in public university budgets due to alleged “indoctrination of social justice,” oppose the adoption of federal money for schools in statements of federal excessive and scarce spending, and deny failed applications to allow families to spend public money on private schooling.
Reibold, a foil for Nate’s political priorities and red meat rhetoric, continued to openly criticize the record in office. “I’m not sure people understand what Ron will do if he takes office,” she said, adding that her discontent would resonate with voters and that they would return her to 34th District B just two days before the anniversary of her primary defeat in 2020. year.
Yes, her campaign to divert Nate is about providing access to water for other farmers, easing growth tensions in Madison County and “rebuilding” the method of funding Idaho schools, but in many ways this applies to her rival.
Asked why she did not challenge John Weber MP from Rexburg, who is second in the House of Representatives, Reibuld said: “Why should I challenge the incumbent legislator, who I think is doing a good job?”
With elephants and RINO
Fighting Reibuld and Nate – one on one The Legislative Party opposes hardliners against major Republicans on the eve of the primaries on May 17. In primaries with similar profiles, the right wing of the party marked its orthodox opponents, RINO, only Republicans, while traditional Republicans sometimes called their opponents extremists.
The meeting of Nate and Reibuld became one of the most observed in the May primaries of the two horses in the state; their controversial rematch comes after Nate scored just 52.2% of the vote in 2020. Thus, Nate and Reibuld’s struggle for the newly redeveloped Rexburg County 34 could become one of the closest primary races, helping to form a solid red majority in the legislature for the next two years.
There is no guarantee that education will turn into a historically close race in the county where Brigham Young University in Idaho is located, a private institution of Latter-day Saints where Nate teaches economics. However, school policy is one of the most obvious areas where candidates diverge, with the abolition of the food tax – something Nate was trying to push through deploying broad legislative maneuvers – as a notable exception.
Rabuld advocates reassessing the state’s formula for funding K-12 schools and giving districts more flexibility in how they spend public money, changes she said could offset the district’s dependence on local property taxes.
“It may mean that some extra funds will go to school districts, but I don’t think that’s an automatic requirement,” she said in an interview with EdNews last month.
Nate more accurately said, “I think Idaho’s education system is well funded,” indicating that school funding will increase soon. Debate of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Rexburg. He also mentioned in his response bonuses of $ 1,000 for K-12 school staff introduced by law into law, and Reibuld was quick to point out that he had voted against bonuses funded by the federal fund.
The rhetorical differences of the contenders are more obvious when it comes to higher education. Reibold, for example, points to public colleges and universities as imperfect competitors for students and argues that if senior executives don’t meet students ’needs, students will go elsewhere.
“I’m a little concerned when we try to demonize those who run our higher education institutions, when in fact they are hardworking and trying to do their best with the help of the students they serve,” she told EdNews.
Conversely, Nate echoed one of his legislative talks, warning debate that Idaho “is under attack by waking up on the left agenda.”
“They are trying to bring a critical racial theory, an agenda of social justice, and they are preparing children by sexualizing education and our media. We need a tower guard to make sure Idaho is not the next victim of the local left-wing program, ”he said.
Replacing Raybould with Nate could change the tone of the Joint Financial Appropriations Committee meetings, where Nate insisted on senior editors about efforts to include and teach about race while writing the budget. Nate’s dismissal combined with ally, Priscilla Giddings ’ally, R-White Bird, who is being sent to the position of lieutenant governor, will deprive the JFAC of a two-vote coalition seeking greater budget cuts in the House and Senate group.
It should be noted that it is unclear whether her victory will return Raybould a committee that will soon be reformedof which she was a member during her solitary tenure, as the tasks of the committees correspond to the leaders of the majority.
The fate of the future Republican candidate, who will run in the general election without cooperation, is more certain.
Looking for a fourth term, Nate has shown himself to be a budget hawk – “the government is now floating in your tax dollars” – and vice versa. During the election campaign, Reibuld called it unprocessed and inefficient, stressing the willingness of voters to work with colleagues to balance the state budget.
Their disputes over finances, however, were not limited to their legislative records.
“Boise Insiders,” “Dark Money,” and Gold Trading
One of the most controversial moments of the debate in Rexburg took place when Reibold and Nate pointed fingers at each other over donations they received from interest groups.
“My opponent receives more than 66% of her donations from special interest groups, from the PAC, from Boise insiders,” Nate said, condemning the “disproportionate influence” of lobbyists in the Capitol.
Reibold, the financial director of her family’s farm, received $ 7,300 from agricultural groups including Idaho farms and agricultural policy committees. She also received $ 1,000 from the PAC Credit Union, $ 1,000 from the PAC United Heritage Trust, a real estate and victim company, and $ 1,000 from the General Contractors Association. She received $ 2,000 from the Idaho Public Services Association and $ 1,000 from Republican Republican Governor-designate Tommy Alquist in 2018.
EdNews estimates that donations from interest groups amounted to about $ 10,000 of her fundraiser, which is just over 6% of her total $ 165,000.
“I don’t know where Ron got his numbers from,” Reibuld joked.
She then went on the offensive, knocking down $ 3,000 that Nate received from members of the Freedom Foundation board and their relatives. She knocked the band out refusing to disclose their donors.
“A lot of money. I just openly say where I come from, ”Reibuld said.
Said Nate: “It’s funny to me that my opponent is talking about black money when, when you look at your inbox, you see all the mail coming about Nate’s representative from these special interest groups trying to denigrate the incumbent by his conservative values ».
He did not specify which interest groups he meant, and declined to be interviewed for the story.
Nate received $ 1,000 from the Bonville County Republican Central Committee, where Nate Foundation board members and donors Nate Doyle Beck and Brian Smith are party officials, which was a rare move. the local party got into hot water with the state GOP.
Reibold, a Republican party official from Madison, said the donation was “non-American” and “crossed the border.”
“If you set up a system in which the central party takes the position that they are going to nominate and elect a candidate … then, frankly, how different it is from some of these, you know, communist countries with central parties that can choose and elect which candidates are on the ballot from their party? ” she told EdNews.
Nate, who unsuccessfully pushed the legislature to give the state treasury power to buy gold and silveralso received $ 1,000 from Stefan Gleason, owner of Eagle’s Money Metals Exchange, which publicly expressed in favor of such efforts. Michael Gleason of the same company donated $ 500. Stefan Gleason also gave $ 1,000 to Nate’s campaign ahead of the 2020 election and another $ 1,000 through his metallurgical business. Nate received another $ 250 from the metal exchange company Midas Gold before his last term.
Prominent family members of both candidates also participated in their campaign. Reibuld received $ 1,000 from her grandfather, former Republican MP Del Reibold, who represented Rexburg along with Nate in the House of Representatives. The same amount Nate received from his wife Maria Nate, who is actively involved in far-right politics; Maria Nate did not respond to an interview request for this story.
Reibold sits at $ 165,000 versus Nate’s $ 61,000. Although surpasses its opponent in 2020 was not enough to win her in the race.
Will this election be different? In six days she will find out.
You may also be interested