Most parental failures are marked long in advance and you can see how they are moving towards you in slow motion. “Oh, forgot to instill sports ethics,” you think. “It will bite me in 10 years.” And that’s true if you have a child who dodges when someone throws a ball at her, no matter how much she warned that it was part of an established game.
Then failures that fall on your head like an anvil in a cartoon. “What was really wrong Margaret Thatcher? ” A 14-year-old boy came from school and asked. “She seems to be fine. Popular. Modernization.
“And evil! You have forgotten evil! ”
“But which parts were evil?”
Don’t fail, whatever you do, into this issue with the miners ’strike and the destruction of the coal industry. The kids are thinking now coal itself is evil (fairly – in favor of rear vision), and it has turned Thatcher into a clairvoyant, almost fabulous figure-godmother, who tries to decarbonize during the attack of mustachioed dinosaurs. At the time there was a certain amount of controversy, I now recall, when we were both anti-global warming and strike miners, but in those days we were able to make nuances.
I tried, “Thatcher, Thatcher, the milk thief,” and then had to describe how before her hard cost reduction we were all given a daily bottle of warm milk during a break, and he said, “You used to love milk so much?” And I say “No, it was disgusting, but that’s not the point.”
Circling around Thatcher’s legacy, it’s surprisingly hard to find a smoking gun; much easier to explain why people hate Tony Blair, especially when he returns to Labor. The split in the party around his leadership and legacy feels as fresh as yesterday.
But go back to the 80s and everything will be pretty abstract. The concept of mass social housing as a collective resource has appeared so long ago that one could speak of world barriers. “Well, son, before that asshole Henry VII anyone could just kill a pig and eat it. And that is why people hate Tudors ”.
In the end, I went for what I consider to be one of the most harmful statements, although I know his attribution is disputed, and even when Thatcher said it, she wasn’t the first to say it, “A man who’s not only in at the age of 26, being on a bus can be considered a failure ”.
“I agree with that, however,” he said.
“Wait for that?”
“Buses are rubbish.”
“But … What would you hope to take instead of a 25-and-a-half-year-old bus?”
“Probably a bike.”
“She didn’t mean that at all!”
We moved on because the curriculum also moved on Brixton riotswhich they returned home, believing it was the result of a giant misunderstanding: people thought the police were attacking Michael Bailey, but in fact they were trying to help him. According to teenagers, this probably would not have happened in the era of social networks, as information spreads faster. “Well, until a certain point … That was the immediate cause, but there was quite a lot of background.” Yes yes. They know all about the stop and search and the drought law. They described it as “ironic” – civil unrest that should not have gotten out of hand.
Fortunately, other, more insightful people have planned this moment, when the events of your own youth will go down in history, and you will have to do a little better than: “It was not a riot – it was an uprising! ” Big Narsti made a brilliant podcast about it last year. A meticulous mind is read and understood Scarman’s report. I wonder if I can’t describe any of this better in what I thought of my parents and their “news” about the way my kids think of me and mine: waving adults, overreacting to inevitable events.