Home Education What should we call personal + virtual meetings?

What should we call personal + virtual meetings?

3 reasons why we joined the Noodle Advisory Board

I am grateful to Matt Reed for continuing the conversation about how we work together in academia.

In my wording Kim’s law, I was trying to figure out why the combination of personal meetings and meetings in Zoom is almost always unpleasant and unproductive. This is stated in the “law”. the quality of the physical / virtual meeting is directly proportional to the status of the virtual participants.

In the article Purpose, he used the language “hybrid” to describe meetings where some participants are virtual and some – in person. Lent’s goal made me think about how the language we use to describe the pandemic has not caught up with reality. We need a more accurate vocabulary to describe work and social life today.

“Hybrid” works by describing meetings where participants are distributed across physical and digital spaces. We know exactly what Matt means when he calls these meetings hybrid.

But in other respects, using a “hybrid” to describe what is not an occupation or a course (meeting) is problematic.

For teaching and learning, we use a hybrid course description that has both personal and online components. A hybrid degree program is commonly understood as a program that is provided mostly online and that contains some expectations on campus and hours face to face.

The template language that we have for mixed meetings is in person and Zoom in the course setting giflex. Students on the hyflex course can choose whether they want to attend physically (in class) or virtually (using Zoom or any platform used).

“Hyflex” does not work, however, when applied to meetings.

First, my interpretation of hyflex for learning is that the idea combines the flexibility of place and time. Students can study anywhere and anytime. You can interact with the course materials both synchronously and asynchronously. It doesn’t work for meetings.

Second, the concept of hyflex training remains highly controversial in the higher edition. While everyone likes the idea of ​​flexibility and inclusion, everyone who has taught (or worked with instructors) knows how very difficult it is to design and conduct a quality hyflex class. Not impossible, just hard.

So where does this leave us?

If a hybrid is problematic and hyflex is unsuitable, what could be a simpler language to describe the mixed physical / virtual encounters that can actually be taken?

Some candidates:

xMeeting: What if you put an “x” before the word meeting? We will allow “x” to denote a combination of virtual or physical.

PolyMeeting: The prefix poly means “many”. Here the “field” refers to many places.

PanMeetingA: Pan is the prefix for “all”. The meeting is a place where all people can participate, wherever they are.

MaxiMeeting: Maxi means big or as big as possible. Without limiting physical space or the need to travel MaxiMeeting can be as great as we want.

Mixed: It is probably a mistake to combine the language we use for teaching with the language of the meeting. Blended learning has special and other implications in education.

Multi-meetingA: Multi means a lot, and MultiMeeting has participants from many places.

aCentric: The prefix “a” means no. Thus, the aCentric meeting is nowhere to be found.

UltraMeeting (or uMeeting): When we say that something is “ultra”, we mean that it is something extreme.

Mostly office meetings / meetings at Zoom are awful, but when we work on our language, it can motivate us to work on meeting design.

What do you think?

What mixed face-to-face / virtual meetings are called on your campus?

How do discussions about language turn into use, dissemination, and ubiquity?

What are your meetings?

Source link

Previous articleThe Grimsby Institute for Continuing and Higher Education Wins CLA Award in Support of Creativity at AoC Beacon Awards 2022 – FE News
Next articleStudy Reveals Strange Inactivation Mechanism for Volt-Directed Ion Channel – ScienceDaily